最新网址:m.llskw.org
第120章 (第1/3页)
(b) Delayed recall?
(c) Delayed recognition?
Plot these data on a bar graph. Use different shaded bars for the two experimental conditions.
Recall
Frequenc
y
Memory Measure
409
DETECTING GUILT AND DECEPTION
OBJECTIVES
1. To analyze the various behavioral indicators of an individual’s guilt feelings.
2. To collect different kinds of data from the same subjects, both quantitative (reaction time) and
qualitative (word associations and expressive reactions).
3. To combine these multiple sources of evidence in order to draw inferences about the guilt or
innocence of two (role-playing) suspects.
4. To consider how emotional arousal and unconscious motives may affect behavior.
5 . To raise questions about practical issues in jury decision making and the use of lie detectors in
courts and business.
OVERVIEW
“Detecting Guilt” is designed to involve the whole class in psychological detective work on a problem with
both practical implications and broad conceptual significance. The demonstration casts students in the role
of jurors who must decide the guilt or innocence of two criminal suspects. To do so, they must utilize a
variety of behavioral indicators of emotional disturbance, including word associations, reaction times, and
expressive behavior.
1. Begin by asking students to mention something that made them feel very guilty in the past (in
elementary, junior high, or high school).
2. Have them try to come up with a definition of guilt.
3. Ask them what are the negative consequences and positive effects of guilt, analyze the common
elements, and list their answers to the questions.
4. Briefly contrast the conscious and unconscious forms that guilt may take (the student examples are
likely to be conscious instances).
5. Relate the discussion back to the memory analysis of the previous week (if you did that
demonstration) by having students consider the effects of guilt on memory.
6. Ask the students if they were ever in a situation in which they felt guil
(本章未完,请点击下一页继续阅读)
最新网址:m.llskw.org